More date **
The California Fair Employment and Housing (“FEHA”) prohibits discrimination on the basis of gender. A prospective plaintiff must prove that they were qualified for the position they were performing, they suffered an adverse employment action, such as a termination, demotion or denial of an available job, and the circumstances suggest a discriminatory motive. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.(2000) 24 Cal.4th 317.
When determining whether “adverse action” has occurred the law mandates that the unique circumstances of the affected employee, as well as the context of the particular workplace must be taken into consideration. Yanowitz v. L’Oreal USA, Inc. (2005) 36 Cal. 4th 1028, 1052.
Learn more about [state] and [federal] gender discrimination.
The information you obtain at our website ( www.pairavilaw.com ) is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your situation as each case is different. We invite you to contact us to discuss the specifics of your case, however, contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship nor guarantee acceptance of your case. Please do not send any confidential information to us until an attorney-client relationship has been established.
We are passionate about protecting the rights of mistreated employees.
Call : 310.789.2063
info@pairavilaw.com Mon – Fri 09:00-17:00